What’s hiding inside cosmetics sold on Temu?

What’s hiding inside cosmetics sold on Temu?

What’s hiding inside cosmetics sold on Temu?

What’s hiding inside cosmetics sold on Temu?

When buying products, consumers expect clear and accurate information about what’s inside. However, several studies have shown that items sold on Temu often provide minimal—and sometimes misleading—details, particularly regarding chemical components (The Sun, 2024; Channel News Asia, 2024; Forbrugerrådet Tænk, 2024).


Driven by curiosity, we decided to conduct our own investigation, starting with cosmetics, to assess whether Temu falls short in product transparency. Additionally, we were inspired by the new initiative by the Danish Safety Technology Authority (Sikkerhedsstyrelsen), which aims to use AI tools to screen Temu for illegal products. 


Our investigation into 600 cosmetic products sold on Temu, revealed transparency and safety issues:

When buying products, consumers expect clear and accurate information about what’s inside. However, several studies have shown that items sold on Temu often provide minimal—and sometimes misleading—details, particularly regarding chemical components (The Sun, 2024; Channel News Asia, 2024; Forbrugerrådet Tænk, 2024).


Driven by curiosity, we decided to conduct our own investigation, starting with cosmetics, to assess whether Temu falls short in product transparency. Additionally, we were inspired by the new initiative by the Danish Safety Technology Authority (Sikkerhedsstyrelsen), which aims to use AI tools to screen Temu for illegal products. 


Our investigation into 600 cosmetic products sold on Temu, revealed transparency and safety issues:

When buying products, consumers expect clear and accurate information about what’s inside. However, several studies have shown that items sold on Temu often provide minimal—and sometimes misleading—details, particularly regarding chemical components (The Sun, 2024; Channel News Asia, 2024; Forbrugerrådet Tænk, 2024).


Driven by curiosity, we decided to conduct our own investigation, starting with cosmetics, to assess whether Temu falls short in product transparency. Additionally, we were inspired by the new initiative by the Danish Safety Technology Authority (Sikkerhedsstyrelsen), which aims to use AI tools to screen Temu for illegal products. 


Our investigation into 600 cosmetic products sold on Temu, revealed transparency and safety issues:

When buying products, consumers expect clear and accurate information about what’s inside. However, several studies have shown that items sold on Temu often provide minimal—and sometimes misleading—details, particularly regarding chemical components (The Sun, 2024; Channel News Asia, 2024; Forbrugerrådet Tænk, 2024).


Driven by curiosity, we decided to conduct our own investigation, starting with cosmetics, to assess whether Temu falls short in product transparency. Additionally, we were inspired by the new initiative by the Danish Safety Technology Authority (Sikkerhedsstyrelsen), which aims to use AI tools to screen Temu for illegal products. 


Our investigation into 600 cosmetic products sold on Temu, revealed transparency and safety issues:

To collect info about the 600 cosmetic products, we initially tried automated methods to gather data on Temu's site, but we ran into technical barriers like verification tests (e.g., "I'm not a robot" checks) and other tools that block data collection. These barriers often locked us out of the site, making automated data collection impossible.


This left us with the question: Why is Temu making it so difficult to access product information?


Persistently, we successfully gathered the key information after several days of extensive copy-pasting.


Let’s begin our analysis with a visual overview of the 600 cosmetic products, grouped into categories: Lips, Eyes, and Face. Each category is made up of different product types, such as lipsticks, eyeshadows, and foundations, with 40 products in each type. In the visualization, each bubble represents a product, and its size corresponds to the total number of ingredients. Products with fewer than 10 ingredients are shown as gray bubbles, while red dots highlight products with no listed ingredients.

15% of products list no ingredients at all

15% of products list no ingredients at all, in violation of EU regulations, and 28% list fewer than 10 ingredients, falling short of transparency standards.

15% of products list no ingredients at all

15% of products list no ingredients at all, in violation of EU regulations, and 28% list fewer than 10 ingredients, falling short of transparency standards.

Ingredients often appear in random order

Ingredients often appear in random order, ignoring EU rules that require listing in descending order of concentration (EU Cosmetics Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009).

Ingredients often appear in random order

Ingredients often appear in random order, ignoring EU rules that require listing in descending order of concentration (EU Cosmetics Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009).

64% of chemicals pose medium to high risks

Our chemical analysis shows that while 36% of chemicals are classified as low risk, 64% pose potential health concerns, including 58% at medium risk and 4% classified as high risk and 2% as unknown, raising significant concerns about safety.

64% of chemicals pose medium to high risks

Our chemical analysis shows that while 36% of chemicals are classified as low risk, 64% pose potential health concerns, including 58% at medium risk and 4% classified as high risk and 2% as unknown, raising significant concerns about safety.

64% of chemicals pose medium to high risks

Our chemical analysis shows that while 36% of chemicals are classified as low risk, 64% pose potential health concerns, including 58% at medium risk and 4% classified as high risk and 2% as unknown, raising significant concerns about safety.

64% of chemicals pose medium to high risks

Our chemical analysis shows that while 36% of chemicals are classified as low risk, 64% pose potential health concerns, including 58% at medium risk and 4% classified as high risk and 2% as unknown, raising significant concerns about safety.

64% of chemicals pose medium to high risks

Our chemical analysis shows that while 36% of chemicals are classified as low risk, 64% pose potential health concerns, including 58% at medium risk and 4% classified as high risk and 2% as unknown, raising significant concerns about safety.

15% of products list no ingredients at all

15% of products list no ingredients at all, in violation of EU regulations, and 28% list fewer than 10 ingredients, falling short of transparency standards.

15% of products list no ingredients at all

15% of products list no ingredients at all, in violation of EU regulations, and 28% list fewer than 10 ingredients, falling short of transparency standards.

15% of products list no ingredients at all

15% of products list no ingredients at all, in violation of EU regulations, and 28% list fewer than 10 ingredients, falling short of transparency standards.

Ingredients often appear in random order

Ingredients often appear in random order, ignoring EU rules that require listing in descending order of concentration (EU Cosmetics Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009).

Ingredients often appear in random order

Ingredients often appear in random order, ignoring EU rules that require listing in descending order of concentration (EU Cosmetics Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009).

Ingredients often appear in random order

Ingredients often appear in random order, ignoring EU rules that require listing in descending order of concentration (EU Cosmetics Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009).

To collect info about the 600 cosmetic products, we initially tried automated methods to gather data on Temu's site, but we ran into technical barriers like verification tests (e.g., "I'm not a robot" checks) and other tools that block data collection. These barriers often locked us out of the site, making automated data collection impossible.


This left us with the question: Why is Temu making it so difficult to access product information?


Persistently, we successfully gathered the key information after several days of extensive copy-pasting.


Let’s begin our analysis with a visual overview of the 600 cosmetic products, grouped into categories: Lips, Eyes, and Face. Each category is made up of different product types, such as lipsticks, eyeshadows, and foundations, with 40 products in each type. In the visualization, each bubble represents a product, and its size corresponds to the total number of ingredients. Products with fewer than 10 ingredients are shown as gray bubbles, while red dots highlight products with no listed ingredients.

Products sold on Temu

Explore cosmetic products and their chemical content

Products sold on Temu

Explore cosmetic products and their chemical content

Our analysis reveals that 28% of products list fewer than 10 ingredients. Given that typical cosmetic products contain between 15 to 50 ingredients, this suggests incomplete ingredient listings (Science.org.au). Furthermore, 15% of the products analyzed provide no ingredient listings at all, making it challenging for consumers to make informed decisions. This lack of transparency does not comply with EU regulations, which mandate full ingredient disclosure in descending order of concentration (EU Cosmetics Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009).


Additionally, we conducted spot checks and uncovered several cases of non-compliance on Temu. For example, among the 600 products analyzed, 123 contained Methylparaben, a preservative with strict usage limits. Of these, 120 listed Methylparaben among the top 3 ingredients, indicating concentrations that likely exceed the EU’s maximum permitted levels of 0.4% when used alone or 0.8% when combined with other parabens.  This raises questions about the accuracy of ingredient listings and non-compliance with EU safety regulations.


Now let’s dive into the ~500 chemicals identified across the cosmetics, with the size of each bubble indicating the frequency of occurrence. The color represents the chemical risk level based on potential health hazards. The concentration of ingredients on Temu's site can appear in a random order, making it difficult to determine if any exceed the recommended exposure limits set by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA).

Our analysis reveals that 28% of products list fewer than 10 ingredients. Given that typical cosmetic products contain between 15 to 50 ingredients, this suggests incomplete ingredient listings (Science.org.au). Furthermore, 15% of the products analyzed provide no ingredient listings at all, making it challenging for consumers to make informed decisions. This lack of transparency does not comply with EU regulations, which mandate full ingredient disclosure in descending order of concentration (EU Cosmetics Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009).


Additionally, we conducted spot checks and uncovered several cases of non-compliance on Temu. For example, among the 600 products analyzed, 123 contained Methylparaben, a preservative with strict usage limits. Of these, 120 listed Methylparaben among the top 3 ingredients, indicating concentrations that likely exceed the EU’s maximum permitted levels of 0.4% when used alone or 0.8% when combined with other parabens.  This raises questions about the accuracy of ingredient listings and non-compliance with EU safety regulations.


Now let’s dive into the ~500 chemicals identified across the cosmetics, with the size of each bubble indicating the frequency of occurrence. The color represents the chemical risk level based on potential health hazards. The concentration of ingredients on Temu's site can appear in a random order, making it difficult to determine if any exceed the recommended exposure limits set by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA).

Our analysis reveals that 28% of products list fewer than 10 ingredients. Given that typical cosmetic products contain between 15 to 50 ingredients, this suggests incomplete ingredient listings (Science.org.au). Furthermore, 15% of the products analyzed provide no ingredient listings at all, making it challenging for consumers to make informed decisions. This lack of transparency does not comply with EU regulations, which mandate full ingredient disclosure in descending order of concentration (EU Cosmetics Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009).


Additionally, we conducted spot checks and uncovered several cases of non-compliance on Temu. For example, among the 600 products analyzed, 123 contained Methylparaben, a preservative with strict usage limits. Of these, 120 listed Methylparaben among the top 3 ingredients, indicating concentrations that likely exceed the EU’s maximum permitted levels of 0.4% when used alone or 0.8% when combined with other parabens.  This raises questions about the accuracy of ingredient listings and non-compliance with EU safety regulations.


Now let’s dive into the ~500 chemicals identified across the cosmetics, with the size of each bubble indicating the frequency of occurrence. The color represents the chemical risk level based on potential health hazards. The concentration of ingredients on Temu's site can appear in a random order, making it difficult to determine if any exceed the recommended exposure limits set by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA).

Our analysis reveals that 28% of products list fewer than 10 ingredients. Given that typical cosmetic products contain between 15 to 50 ingredients, this suggests incomplete ingredient listings (Science.org.au). Furthermore, 15% of the products analyzed provide no ingredient listings at all, making it challenging for consumers to make informed decisions. This lack of transparency does not comply with EU regulations, which mandate full ingredient disclosure in descending order of concentration (EU Cosmetics Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009).


Additionally, we conducted spot checks and uncovered several cases of non-compliance on Temu. For example, among the 600 products analyzed, 123 contained Methylparaben, a preservative with strict usage limits. Of these, 120 listed Methylparaben among the top 3 ingredients, indicating concentrations that likely exceed the EU’s maximum permitted levels of 0.4% when used alone or 0.8% when combined with other parabens.  This raises questions about the accuracy of ingredient listings and non-compliance with EU safety regulations.


Now let’s dive into the ~500 chemicals identified across the cosmetics, with the size of each bubble indicating the frequency of occurrence. The color represents the chemical risk level based on potential health hazards. The concentration of ingredients on Temu's site can appear in a random order, making it difficult to determine if any exceed the recommended exposure limits set by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA).

Chemicals in products sold on Temu

Explore chemicals and their safety information

Chemicals in products sold on Temu

Explore chemicals and their safety information

Our analysis shows that 36% of the chemicals are classified as low risk, 2% have unknown risk levels, 58% are medium risk, and 4% are defined as high risk. This indicates that 64% of the chemicals may pose potential health concerns.


If health issues arise, consumers typically have a clear path for resolution. For products purchased from a Danish retailer, you should start by contacting the retailer directly. If the problem remains unresolved, you can escalate it to the Danish Consumer Complaints Board (Forbrugerklagenævnet) or the Danish Competition and Consumer Authority (Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen).


However, if the product was bought on Temu, resolving these issues may follow a different process. Danish consumer protection laws may not apply, so your first point of contact will likely be Temu’s customer service. That said, each product on Temu is required to list an EU Responsible Person. This individual or entity ensures compliance with EU safety regulations and can serve as a secondary point of contact if safety concerns arise or if Temu's support is unhelpful.

Conclusion: Why regulatory compliance matters

Conclusion: Why regulatory compliance matters

Conclusion:
Why regulatory compliance matters

While EU regulations aim to ensure that consumers have access to safe and transparent products, our analysis of the 600 cosmetics sold on Temu reveals that their ingredient listings often fall short of these transparency standards.


To sell products on the European market, cosmetics retailers must adhere to strict regulations, including:

  • Cosmetic Product Safety Report (CPSR): Providing a detailed report that includes toxicological profiles and expert safety assessments for each product.

  • Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP): Following rigorous GMP guidelines, supported by regular audits to ensure consistent product quality.

  • Comprehensive testing: Conducting extensive testing to guarantee product safety and effectiveness throughout its shelf life.

  • Full ingredient transparency: Listing all ingredients in descending order of quantity, as required by EU regulations.

  • EU-based responsible person: Appointing an EU Responsible Person and maintaining a complete Product Information File (PIF) for traceability and regulatory oversight.


These requirements ensure that consumers can trust the accuracy of ingredient listings and the safety of the chemicals in cosmetics purchased from European retailers.


See more about the chemicals and ingredient listings of products sold on Temu in our data visualizations, which highlight:



How we analyzed the data: We utilized the European Commission’s Cosmetic Ingredient Database (CosIng) to identify and verify chemical names, including potential misspellings. The CAS numbers (unique identifiers for chemical substances) of these chemicals were cross-referenced against the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) database for hazard information.


To enhance our analysis, we employed the Complir engine, which uses Generative AI to describe chemicals, identify relevant legislation, assess risks based on ECHA hazard data, and justify risk ratings. This methodology ensured accurate findings despite significant data collection challenges.

© 2024 Complir ApS, all right reserved.
CVR 44942003, Copenhagen, DK 1171.
contact@complir.io

© 2024 Complir ApS, all right reserved.
CVR 44942003, Copenhagen, DK 1171.
contact@complir.io

© 2024 Complir ApS, all right reserved.
CVR: 44942003, Copenhagen, DK 1171
contact@complir.io